141 lines
7.0 KiB
HTML
141 lines
7.0 KiB
HTML
|
<html lang="en">
|
||
|
<head>
|
||
|
<title>Free Documentation - Debugging with GDB</title>
|
||
|
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html">
|
||
|
<meta name="description" content="Debugging with GDB">
|
||
|
<meta name="generator" content="makeinfo 4.13">
|
||
|
<link title="Top" rel="start" href="index.html#Top">
|
||
|
<link rel="up" href="Summary.html#Summary" title="Summary">
|
||
|
<link rel="prev" href="Free-Software.html#Free-Software" title="Free Software">
|
||
|
<link rel="next" href="Contributors.html#Contributors" title="Contributors">
|
||
|
<link href="http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/" rel="generator-home" title="Texinfo Homepage">
|
||
|
<!--
|
||
|
Copyright (C) 1988-2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
|
||
|
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or
|
||
|
any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with the
|
||
|
Invariant Sections being ``Free Software'' and ``Free Software Needs
|
||
|
Free Documentation'', with the Front-Cover Texts being ``A GNU Manual,''
|
||
|
and with the Back-Cover Texts as in (a) below.
|
||
|
|
||
|
(a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You are free to copy and modify
|
||
|
this GNU Manual. Buying copies from GNU Press supports the FSF in
|
||
|
developing GNU and promoting software freedom.''
|
||
|
-->
|
||
|
<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css">
|
||
|
<style type="text/css"><!--
|
||
|
pre.display { font-family:inherit }
|
||
|
pre.format { font-family:inherit }
|
||
|
pre.smalldisplay { font-family:inherit; font-size:smaller }
|
||
|
pre.smallformat { font-family:inherit; font-size:smaller }
|
||
|
pre.smallexample { font-size:smaller }
|
||
|
pre.smalllisp { font-size:smaller }
|
||
|
span.sc { font-variant:small-caps }
|
||
|
span.roman { font-family:serif; font-weight:normal; }
|
||
|
span.sansserif { font-family:sans-serif; font-weight:normal; }
|
||
|
--></style>
|
||
|
</head>
|
||
|
<body>
|
||
|
<div class="node">
|
||
|
<a name="Free-Documentation"></a>
|
||
|
<p>
|
||
|
Next: <a rel="next" accesskey="n" href="Contributors.html#Contributors">Contributors</a>,
|
||
|
Previous: <a rel="previous" accesskey="p" href="Free-Software.html#Free-Software">Free Software</a>,
|
||
|
Up: <a rel="up" accesskey="u" href="Summary.html#Summary">Summary</a>
|
||
|
<hr>
|
||
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<h3 class="unnumberedsec">Free Software Needs Free Documentation</h3>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>The biggest deficiency in the free software community today is not in
|
||
|
the software—it is the lack of good free documentation that we can
|
||
|
include with the free software. Many of our most important
|
||
|
programs do not come with free reference manuals and free introductory
|
||
|
texts. Documentation is an essential part of any software package;
|
||
|
when an important free software package does not come with a free
|
||
|
manual and a free tutorial, that is a major gap. We have many such
|
||
|
gaps today.
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>Consider Perl, for instance. The tutorial manuals that people
|
||
|
normally use are non-free. How did this come about? Because the
|
||
|
authors of those manuals published them with restrictive terms—no
|
||
|
copying, no modification, source files not available—which exclude
|
||
|
them from the free software world.
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>That wasn't the first time this sort of thing happened, and it was far
|
||
|
from the last. Many times we have heard a GNU user eagerly describe a
|
||
|
manual that he is writing, his intended contribution to the community,
|
||
|
only to learn that he had ruined everything by signing a publication
|
||
|
contract to make it non-free.
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>Free documentation, like free software, is a matter of freedom, not
|
||
|
price. The problem with the non-free manual is not that publishers
|
||
|
charge a price for printed copies—that in itself is fine. (The Free
|
||
|
Software Foundation sells printed copies of manuals, too.) The
|
||
|
problem is the restrictions on the use of the manual. Free manuals
|
||
|
are available in source code form, and give you permission to copy and
|
||
|
modify. Non-free manuals do not allow this.
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>The criteria of freedom for a free manual are roughly the same as for
|
||
|
free software. Redistribution (including the normal kinds of
|
||
|
commercial redistribution) must be permitted, so that the manual can
|
||
|
accompany every copy of the program, both on-line and on paper.
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>Permission for modification of the technical content is crucial too.
|
||
|
When people modify the software, adding or changing features, if they
|
||
|
are conscientious they will change the manual too—so they can
|
||
|
provide accurate and clear documentation for the modified program. A
|
||
|
manual that leaves you no choice but to write a new manual to document
|
||
|
a changed version of the program is not really available to our
|
||
|
community.
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>Some kinds of limits on the way modification is handled are
|
||
|
acceptable. For example, requirements to preserve the original
|
||
|
author's copyright notice, the distribution terms, or the list of
|
||
|
authors, are ok. It is also no problem to require modified versions
|
||
|
to include notice that they were modified. Even entire sections that
|
||
|
may not be deleted or changed are acceptable, as long as they deal
|
||
|
with nontechnical topics (like this one). These kinds of restrictions
|
||
|
are acceptable because they don't obstruct the community's normal use
|
||
|
of the manual.
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>However, it must be possible to modify all the <em>technical</em>
|
||
|
content of the manual, and then distribute the result in all the usual
|
||
|
media, through all the usual channels. Otherwise, the restrictions
|
||
|
obstruct the use of the manual, it is not free, and we need another
|
||
|
manual to replace it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>Please spread the word about this issue. Our community continues to
|
||
|
lose manuals to proprietary publishing. If we spread the word that
|
||
|
free software needs free reference manuals and free tutorials, perhaps
|
||
|
the next person who wants to contribute by writing documentation will
|
||
|
realize, before it is too late, that only free manuals contribute to
|
||
|
the free software community.
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>If you are writing documentation, please insist on publishing it under
|
||
|
the GNU Free Documentation License or another free documentation
|
||
|
license. Remember that this decision requires your approval—you
|
||
|
don't have to let the publisher decide. Some commercial publishers
|
||
|
will use a free license if you insist, but they will not propose the
|
||
|
option; it is up to you to raise the issue and say firmly that this is
|
||
|
what you want. If the publisher you are dealing with refuses, please
|
||
|
try other publishers. If you're not sure whether a proposed license
|
||
|
is free, write to <a href="mailto:licensing@gnu.org">licensing@gnu.org</a>.
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>You can encourage commercial publishers to sell more free, copylefted
|
||
|
manuals and tutorials by buying them, and particularly by buying
|
||
|
copies from the publishers that paid for their writing or for major
|
||
|
improvements. Meanwhile, try to avoid buying non-free documentation
|
||
|
at all. Check the distribution terms of a manual before you buy it,
|
||
|
and insist that whoever seeks your business must respect your freedom.
|
||
|
Check the history of the book, and try to reward the publishers that
|
||
|
have paid or pay the authors to work on it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>The Free Software Foundation maintains a list of free documentation
|
||
|
published by other publishers, at
|
||
|
<a href="http://www.fsf.org/doc/other-free-books.html">http://www.fsf.org/doc/other-free-books.html</a>.
|
||
|
|
||
|
</body></html>
|
||
|
|