120 lines
5.1 KiB
Plaintext
120 lines
5.1 KiB
Plaintext
Introduction
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
UBIFS file-system stands for UBI File System. UBI stands for "Unsorted
|
|
Block Images". UBIFS is a flash file system, which means it is designed
|
|
to work with flash devices. It is important to understand, that UBIFS
|
|
is completely different to any traditional file-system in Linux, like
|
|
Ext2, XFS, JFS, etc. UBIFS represents a separate class of file-systems
|
|
which work with MTD devices, not block devices. The other Linux
|
|
file-system of this class is JFFS2.
|
|
|
|
To make it more clear, here is a small comparison of MTD devices and
|
|
block devices.
|
|
|
|
1 MTD devices represent flash devices and they consist of eraseblocks of
|
|
rather large size, typically about 128KiB. Block devices consist of
|
|
small blocks, typically 512 bytes.
|
|
2 MTD devices support 3 main operations - read from some offset within an
|
|
eraseblock, write to some offset within an eraseblock, and erase a whole
|
|
eraseblock. Block devices support 2 main operations - read a whole
|
|
block and write a whole block.
|
|
3 The whole eraseblock has to be erased before it becomes possible to
|
|
re-write its contents. Blocks may be just re-written.
|
|
4 Eraseblocks become worn out after some number of erase cycles -
|
|
typically 100K-1G for SLC NAND and NOR flashes, and 1K-10K for MLC
|
|
NAND flashes. Blocks do not have the wear-out property.
|
|
5 Eraseblocks may become bad (only on NAND flashes) and software should
|
|
deal with this. Blocks on hard drives typically do not become bad,
|
|
because hardware has mechanisms to substitute bad blocks, at least in
|
|
modern LBA disks.
|
|
|
|
It should be quite obvious why UBIFS is very different to traditional
|
|
file-systems.
|
|
|
|
UBIFS works on top of UBI. UBI is a separate software layer which may be
|
|
found in drivers/mtd/ubi. UBI is basically a volume management and
|
|
wear-leveling layer. It provides so called UBI volumes which is a higher
|
|
level abstraction than a MTD device. The programming model of UBI devices
|
|
is very similar to MTD devices - they still consist of large eraseblocks,
|
|
they have read/write/erase operations, but UBI devices are devoid of
|
|
limitations like wear and bad blocks (items 4 and 5 in the above list).
|
|
|
|
In a sense, UBIFS is a next generation of JFFS2 file-system, but it is
|
|
very different and incompatible to JFFS2. The following are the main
|
|
differences.
|
|
|
|
* JFFS2 works on top of MTD devices, UBIFS depends on UBI and works on
|
|
top of UBI volumes.
|
|
* JFFS2 does not have on-media index and has to build it while mounting,
|
|
which requires full media scan. UBIFS maintains the FS indexing
|
|
information on the flash media and does not require full media scan,
|
|
so it mounts many times faster than JFFS2.
|
|
* JFFS2 is a write-through file-system, while UBIFS supports write-back,
|
|
which makes UBIFS much faster on writes.
|
|
|
|
Similarly to JFFS2, UBIFS supports on-the-flight compression which makes
|
|
it possible to fit quite a lot of data to the flash.
|
|
|
|
Similarly to JFFS2, UBIFS is tolerant of unclean reboots and power-cuts.
|
|
It does not need stuff like fsck.ext2. UBIFS automatically replays its
|
|
journal and recovers from crashes, ensuring that the on-flash data
|
|
structures are consistent.
|
|
|
|
UBIFS scales logarithmically (most of the data structures it uses are
|
|
trees), so the mount time and memory consumption do not linearly depend
|
|
on the flash size, like in case of JFFS2. This is because UBIFS
|
|
maintains the FS index on the flash media. However, UBIFS depends on
|
|
UBI, which scales linearly. So overall UBI/UBIFS stack scales linearly.
|
|
Nevertheless, UBI/UBIFS scales considerably better than JFFS2.
|
|
|
|
The authors of UBIFS believe, that it is possible to develop UBI2 which
|
|
would scale logarithmically as well. UBI2 would support the same API as UBI,
|
|
but it would be binary incompatible to UBI. So UBIFS would not need to be
|
|
changed to use UBI2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mount options
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
(*) == default.
|
|
|
|
bulk_read read more in one go to take advantage of flash
|
|
media that read faster sequentially
|
|
no_bulk_read (*) do not bulk-read
|
|
no_chk_data_crc (*) skip checking of CRCs on data nodes in order to
|
|
improve read performance. Use this option only
|
|
if the flash media is highly reliable. The effect
|
|
of this option is that corruption of the contents
|
|
of a file can go unnoticed.
|
|
chk_data_crc do not skip checking CRCs on data nodes
|
|
compr=none override default compressor and set it to "none"
|
|
compr=lzo override default compressor and set it to "lzo"
|
|
compr=zlib override default compressor and set it to "zlib"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quick usage instructions
|
|
========================
|
|
|
|
The UBI volume to mount is specified using "ubiX_Y" or "ubiX:NAME" syntax,
|
|
where "X" is UBI device number, "Y" is UBI volume number, and "NAME" is
|
|
UBI volume name.
|
|
|
|
Mount volume 0 on UBI device 0 to /mnt/ubifs:
|
|
$ mount -t ubifs ubi0_0 /mnt/ubifs
|
|
|
|
Mount "rootfs" volume of UBI device 0 to /mnt/ubifs ("rootfs" is volume
|
|
name):
|
|
$ mount -t ubifs ubi0:rootfs /mnt/ubifs
|
|
|
|
The following is an example of the kernel boot arguments to attach mtd0
|
|
to UBI and mount volume "rootfs":
|
|
ubi.mtd=0 root=ubi0:rootfs rootfstype=ubifs
|
|
|
|
References
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
UBIFS documentation and FAQ/HOWTO at the MTD web site:
|
|
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html
|
|
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/ubifs.html
|